<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lacy Responds to Zuckerberg Keynote Disaster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/</link>
	<description>Watching the Business of Watching Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:32:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zuckerberg Interview Shows It’s a Wild, Wired World &#171; Catching Flack</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-39134</link>
		<dc:creator>Zuckerberg Interview Shows It’s a Wild, Wired World &#171; Catching Flack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-39134</guid>
		<description>[...] have watched the Zuckerberg-Lacy video, I have read the blow-by-blow blog account. I have watched a video of Lacy try to spin it as Zuckerberg’s fault, rather than her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have watched the Zuckerberg-Lacy video, I have read the blow-by-blow blog account. I have watched a video of Lacy try to spin it as Zuckerberg’s fault, rather than her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blinkdt</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-38306</link>
		<dc:creator>blinkdt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 02:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-38306</guid>
		<description>Please, use the word &quot;like&quot; one more time. Please. I just didn&#039;t get enough of it. And she authored a book? Like cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, use the word &#8220;like&#8221; one more time. Please. I just didn&#8217;t get enough of it. And she authored a book? Like cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning Interviews and Ethnography &#171; Disparate</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-37608</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning Interviews and Ethnography &#171; Disparate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-37608</guid>
		<description>[...] to focus on the &#8220;written&#8221; content, in response to the controversy. Quite clear in this video, even more so in her twittered reply. Both the video and the tweet are already (in)famous. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to focus on the &#8220;written&#8221; content, in response to the controversy. Quite clear in this video, even more so in her twittered reply. Both the video and the tweet are already (in)famous. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-16348</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-16348</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s blames the crowd for ruining SXSW?  OMG.  She must have a very strong support system at home.  What a windbag.  Go interview sorority recruits for RUSH week.  Ask the hard questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s blames the crowd for ruining SXSW?  OMG.  She must have a very strong support system at home.  What a windbag.  Go interview sorority recruits for RUSH week.  Ask the hard questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-11194</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-11194</guid>
		<description>&quot;some guy&quot; said it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;some guy&#8221; said it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Community Guy, Jake McKee - Sarah Lacy still doesn&#8217;t get it</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-10209</link>
		<dc:creator>Community Guy, Jake McKee - Sarah Lacy still doesn&#8217;t get it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-10209</guid>
		<description>[...] internet quasi-celeb has published an article defending herself. (On top of her angry tweet and clueless video) Not only does her article not defend her position, it supports the naysayers and adds more fuel to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] internet quasi-celeb has published an article defending herself. (On top of her angry tweet and clueless video) Not only does her article not defend her position, it supports the naysayers and adds more fuel to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highlights &#38; Observations From SXSWi 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-10062</link>
		<dc:creator>Highlights &#38; Observations From SXSWi 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-10062</guid>
		<description>[...] which has been much written about. Many people seem to agree that the interviewer was self-centered and didn&#039;t understand her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which has been much written about. Many people seem to agree that the interviewer was self-centered and didn&#8217;t understand her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-9998</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-9998</guid>
		<description>As a young female journalist, I&#039;m afraid Lacey is out there giving our kind a bad name. It&#039;s unbelievable that she blames what she acknowledges as a shitty interview on her interviewee - the audience - the organizers - everyone but herself. The interviewer is in control. How could you ever, ever implicate the person you&#039;re interviewing as the reason you had a bad interview? A great skill of a good journalist is coaxing a good interview out of a bad subject. And Zuckerman isn&#039;t by any means a bad subject. 

I know how it feels to have a shitty interview, but total denial is not a good public face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a young female journalist, I&#8217;m afraid Lacey is out there giving our kind a bad name. It&#8217;s unbelievable that she blames what she acknowledges as a shitty interview on her interviewee &#8211; the audience &#8211; the organizers &#8211; everyone but herself. The interviewer is in control. How could you ever, ever implicate the person you&#8217;re interviewing as the reason you had a bad interview? A great skill of a good journalist is coaxing a good interview out of a bad subject. And Zuckerman isn&#8217;t by any means a bad subject. </p>
<p>I know how it feels to have a shitty interview, but total denial is not a good public face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-9985</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-9985</guid>
		<description>She is just plain wrong on a few points:

- sxsw has high profile people every year; ever heard of Dan Rather, Malcolm Gladwell
- there wasn&#039;t a few people in back causing problems, the whole crowd was horrified.
- sxsw is NOT a developer conference, only a small portion of the panels have &#039;CSS&#039; or &#039;AJAX&#039; in the titles...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is just plain wrong on a few points:</p>
<p>- sxsw has high profile people every year; ever heard of Dan Rather, Malcolm Gladwell<br />
- there wasn&#8217;t a few people in back causing problems, the whole crowd was horrified.<br />
- sxsw is NOT a developer conference, only a small portion of the panels have &#8216;CSS&#8217; or &#8216;AJAX&#8217; in the titles&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-9981</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinevideowatch.com/sarah-lacy-responds-to-zuckerberg-keynote-disaster/#comment-9981</guid>
		<description>I was there.

It was that bad. It wasn&#039;t just a few trolls in the back of the room. It was the entire audience. 

What you can&#039;t see on the recorded video is that people started leaving after 30 minutes. People were moaning and talking amongst themselves after 20 minutes. 

There were 8 cameras there. I wish 2 would have been on them and the remaining 6 would have been pointed on the audience. Then those people that weren&#039;t there could see how uncomfortable everyone one was. 

The crowd gave her the benefit of the doubt for over 45 minutes and then finally had enough when Zuckerberg said to her, &quot;You have to ask a question.&quot; At that point, the crowd jumped to it&#039;s feet and applauded for 45 seconds. 

And the above video proves what we in the audience all learned that day, she doesn&#039;t have a clue about who her audience was. And while she may be able to conduct written interviews that go through a tremendous amount of editing and rewrites, she&#039;s not mature enough or quick on her feet to deal with an audience in real time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there.</p>
<p>It was that bad. It wasn&#8217;t just a few trolls in the back of the room. It was the entire audience. </p>
<p>What you can&#8217;t see on the recorded video is that people started leaving after 30 minutes. People were moaning and talking amongst themselves after 20 minutes. </p>
<p>There were 8 cameras there. I wish 2 would have been on them and the remaining 6 would have been pointed on the audience. Then those people that weren&#8217;t there could see how uncomfortable everyone one was. </p>
<p>The crowd gave her the benefit of the doubt for over 45 minutes and then finally had enough when Zuckerberg said to her, &#8220;You have to ask a question.&#8221; At that point, the crowd jumped to it&#8217;s feet and applauded for 45 seconds. </p>
<p>And the above video proves what we in the audience all learned that day, she doesn&#8217;t have a clue about who her audience was. And while she may be able to conduct written interviews that go through a tremendous amount of editing and rewrites, she&#8217;s not mature enough or quick on her feet to deal with an audience in real time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
