Archive for the ‘P2P’ Category

Skype Partners with Video Sharing Sites

Thursday, August 30th, 2007

Internet calling company Skype has announced new partnerships with Dailymotion and Metacafe as part of the introduction of the latest version of the platform, Skype 3.5.

The newest feature enables users to include videos from Dailymotion and Metacafe as part of their Skype “Mood,” providing a new outlet for sharing your favorite videos. According to the press release, users can also share videos during their conversations. “Video content is a great conversation starter because people love talking about video clips and especially the ones that are personal to them.” said Carter Adamson, general manager, desktop products for Skype.

A new level of convergence? Maybe. Why you wouldn’t just share the link is beyond me, but I’m not one for mixing my media. “Check out this video ,” has always worked just fine for me.

Dovetail Takes Indie Film to Facebook

Friday, August 24th, 2007

Indie online film distributor Dovetail.tv has launched a facebook application allowing users to view Dovetail’s high quality independent programming without leaving the social networking site.

Dovetail has differentiated themselves by offering a high-quality solution using P2P technology. Their facebook app promises to allow users to view HD quality content without leaving the social networking site after installation of their desktop client.

Like Pando and a growing number of companies, Dovetail is offering DRM-protected downloads ensuring peace of mind for the producers on their platform as well as an outlet for them to offer their video in the highest possible quality.

For all the potential of this there are also a lot of barriers. Indie content is by nature niche and thus not the best candidate for pure p2p delivery. Consider the scalability issues Joost has had despite a much higher profile and over 1 million registered users.

Nevertheless it’s good to see outlets like this offering higher quality distribution of long form independent content to users, and interesting to see Facebook becoming an entirely new type of medium for all forms of content delivery.

The Sports Page: Where to Watch the NFL Online

Tuesday, August 21st, 2007

This season, the NFL will offer live streaming video of its games. But there’s a catch. You need DirecTV, or you need to live on another continent.

The NFL may have the most tightly restricted content of any sports league, but there are ways to get the games if you know where to look.

Continue Reading at Tilzy.TV

DCIA Announces P2P Upfront

Sunday, August 12th, 2007

The Distributed Computing Industry Association (DCIA) today announced it will hold the first ever P2P Advertising Upfront this year with day-long conferences at the Princeton Club in New York and at this year’s Digital Hollywood Fall conference in LA.

The upfront is part of an effort to “jump-start a monetization initiative for P2P and social networking traffic and a conversion of this consumer-based distribution channel into a mainstream ad-supported medium.”

While P2P remains a immature sector in terms of mainstream use and monetization there are a growing number of companies using distributed technologies to increase efficiency and lower the cost of distributing video.

There is little doubt that P2P will play a role in the future of media distribution over IP and the sooner advertisers get involved the better, both for producers and for viewers.

Move Networks and the Quality Solution

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

Move Networks recently announced that they will power an online video player for Discovery Communications (more from Corey). Discovery joins a growing number of networks including FOX and ABC which we wrote about last week.

I’m a big proponent of convergence leading all online video back to the living room TV. But that confluence is taking place on two fronts.

On one side are the Verizons of the world installing fiber to deliver IPTV over a closed network. On the other are those developing new codecs and technologies to leverage existing networks and deliver a broadcast-like experience over public internet.

Move Networks is focused on this latter area, improving what they call “quality of experience” for online media delivery over public networks. There has been a lot written about Move, but very little that actually goes into how the technology works.

So earlier this week, I spoke with Move’s VP of marketing Jim Ericson to get a better technical understanding of how they deliver this high quality video for some of the largest media companies in the world.

The basic technology involved is what they call simulcoding which takes a feed and simultaneously encodes it into smaller pieces called “streamlets” using multiple profiles to offer playback at multiple bitrates.

By distributing these streamlets based on end-user demand Move can distribute them over traditional servers. Doing so bypasses the high end media servers used for traditional Flash and Windows Media encoding which in turn lowers streaming costs.

But the key is in the plugin, which manages delivery, assembles and renders the stream, and offers DRM, geo-targeting, and extremely in-depth reporting. Because it puts the end-user environment in control, it can determine the best end-user experience intelligently.

And this is where the quality comes in. Move’s adaptive protocol means that the plugin can determine the best encoding profile for a user based on available bandwidth.

Because multiple profiles are encoded simultaneously the plugin switches between them midstream based on changes in bandwidth. This ensures fluidity of playback and makes it possible for example, to see HD when the capacity is there but lower quality video when someone else taps into your shared wireless connection. It also means people watch longer.

The question of P2P use has often been raised, in discussion of Move’s technology and how much upstream bandwidth is used. Ericson had this to say on the subject:

We still have some lingering concerns about peer-to-peer in general over an asymmetric network. We want to play nicely in [the CDNs] neighborhood so what we’re doing is we’re doing a LAN-limited P2P. There’s no reason for me to go back to the CDN.

The final element in Move’s technology is reporting, and again this is where having a client side plugin is a tremendous advantage. Everything viewed in a Move Networks player is tracked.

They track where viewers are, what they have watched and how long, the bitrate, and when people scrolled back or forward in a given program. All this is more reliable and specific than tracking provided by most CDNs and content management systems which make it extremely valuable to networks and advertisers.

This is where we are going with online video. Content that can be viewed in highest quality by everyone on any broadband connection regardless of connection speed.

Quality is not just valuable to viewers, it makes those viewers more valuable to advertisers. “For anybody watching the content at any time theoretically everyone could be getting a different ad” Ericson said.

And for advertisers that’s just another step closer to the Holy Grail of engagement.

BBC’s iPlayer - What’s the Point?

Friday, July 27th, 2007

The BBC launched their iPlayer service today in beta allowing users to download content that has aired on the network during the past 7 days and watch it for up to 30 days after that. And while as the demo below is kind of cool, why is this needed?

BBC iPlayer from mauee and Vimeo.

Television is still a better viewing experience than the computer. Users can view all the content available through iPlayer and more on demand with a DVR. Once it’s available internationally that will add some value but who knows when that will be? And how many people overseas will really watch?

This project began as the integrated Media Player (iMP) in 2003 at which time it was an innovative idea, especially so because of it’s early use of P2P. But after a 9 month “Public Value Test” and years of waiting they are just now releasing an outdated platform that as far as I can see doesn’t have much demand.

Only time will tell if enough people are willing to go to the difficulty of downloading and viewing BBC content on the computer screen, but as the format of BBC’s own promo (in a 256×144, 34k bitrate windows media video) shows, they’re still way behind when it comes to online video.

UPDATE: They also have this demo for higher bandwidth users at 224k.

ABC Video Player Goes HD

Thursday, July 26th, 2007

ABC became the first network to roll out HD quality video online. And while they’re sure to be paying substantial bandwidth fees, the result as you can see below is pretty impressive.

ABC_HD_Lost1

The video shown above is VP7, running at the peak bitrate of 2,020k. The bandwidth meter in the lower right corner adjusts the bitrate to end-user capacity and fluctuates during play. Because it is progressive download, assisted by the Move Networks plugin, playback is very smooth but also highly taxing on the CPU.

While I’m a fan of this from a viewer standpoint, my biggest question is how can they afford to do this? Sure Move Networks is theoretically taking some of the load off of the CDN, but the economics are still hard to swallow.

At 2MBps, a 50 minute show like Lost will be a 6 Gigabyte 750 MB download. Assuming bandwidth charges of $.10/Gb (very low, but they’re ABC) this will run $.075 per (full) stream viewed. If 25,000 viewers watch that’s nearly $2,000 ABC shells out just in bandwidth fees.

When you consider all the costs, even with big-spending sponsors, it’s difficult to see ad-supported HD video online being profitable, at least in the near term. But I hope they prove me wrong.

National Security

Wednesday, July 25th, 2007

A couple security-related stories today pertaining to online video technology.

One is the hearing over the national security threat posed by P2P networks that took place yesterday and the danger of “inadvertent filesharing.” P2P software can lead people to unknowingly share files they should not, and as a result internal government and fortune 500 company documents are getting out.

ZDNet’s George Ou nails the real problem:

Why are Federal Government IT departments allowing Federal employees to install Lime Wire or any other piece of software on Government computers? The mere fact that Government Employees have administrative access to install software on their computers let alone computers with access to sensitive information is absurd.

Video of the hearing as well as an article titled Why File Sharing Networks are Dangerous can be found on the committee website.

The other story, the investment by In-Q-Tel the CIA’s venture arm in image enhancement company Motion DSP. I’ve always been impressed by companies that can do this, but frankly I had higher expectations of what is possible. The MySpace videos below are provided by the company as a side-by-side comparison of video enhanced with their technology.

Mariachi Band (Unenhanced)

Add to My Profile | More Videos

Mariachi Band (Enhanced by MotionDSP)

Add to My Profile | More Videos

Joost Hits 1 Million Subscribers

Wednesday, July 25th, 2007

According to Silicon Alley Insider, Joost founder Niklas Zennstrom announced that the internet TV platform has reached one million users and is looking at a year-end formal launch.

While a million sign-ups and downloads of the app (if you want one, please click on our invite banner in our sidebar) is nothing to sneeze at, I am highly skeptical that there are still one million users. The beta experience has been underwhelming to say the least. Alley Insider Henry Blodget compared the experience to the too-big-for-its-bandwidth hog, PointCast. Additionally, if there were truly one million users, the P2P environment should be delivering much higher quality video than I’ve seen in my testing.

That said, advertisers are in love with its potential and Joost continues to land big media content deals.

NLPC: Google Soft on Piracy

Wednesday, July 11th, 2007

The National Legal & Policy Center today posted a list of the Top 50 movies and television programs that are widely available through Google Video and YouTube, in efforts to call attention to The Big G’s lack of attention to copyright protection.

Their intent is to “expose the pirating of copyrighted material by finding and posting as many apparently pirated works as possible.”

In case anyone thought they were bluffing, they were kind enough to post a PDF with screenshots.

I am a staunch advocate for the protection of copyrights. And I’m sure that we’ll find a technologically sound and financially beneficial solution to distributing media in a digital environment.

But I would like to know, however, why they put Miami Vice at #6 when its only been viewed 663 times. Yes, I see that the chart is ordered by “Days Posted.” But 663 times over 276 days is roughly 2.5 views per day. Jesus Camp with its whopping 48 views? Bewitched with 242 views over 207 days? 1.1 view a day. It seems a stretch to say that piracy is a $2.3 billion loss for the movie industry when Miami Vice makes your Top 10 list. To be clear, I’m not supporting piracy in any way shape or form. Just pointing out a minor flaw in the way they are presenting their evidence.