Archive for the ‘Real Ads’ Category

Free Online Video! Quitcher Bitchin’

Monday, August 4th, 2008

Have you been to the movies lately? Jeeeeeeeeez. Ridiculous.

As I was sitting there for the 20 minutes of commercials and previews before the movie started, I found myself getting worked up a bit. Why? Because of all of the bitching and moaning that I was hearing from the people around me. By the time the 8th commercial played - all before the previews - there was a healthy (or not so healthy) mix of people laughing and people who were really, really pissed off.

As I mentioned ahead of the weekend, I was going to see The Dark Night. Over hyped. Too long. Overall, though, not too bad.

But as I was sitting there, watching ad after ad play, I starting thinking about online advertising, targeting, free content, and the great value exchange that we’re offered online.

The ads kicked off with a Fandango ad, which makes sense. Buy your tickets online. I’m OK with that one. Then came the Wal-Mart ad featuring their Hannah Montana line of clothes. Now, my niece loves her Hannah Montana t-shirts, but you wont find her watching the darkest Batman movie yet. (Yes, I know their parents are.) Then came a really long Jeep SUV ad (I think it was for Jeep, but I started texting, so I’m not 100% sure). I’m in NYC. I take the subway. Nice targeting. Then the ad for Bertoli pasta sauce. Oy.

Then came a long Coke drive thru ad, which makes sense because I could actually buy a Coke at the concession stand. Then a long Vitamin Water ad, and then finally an ad for AT&T with Martin Scorsese, which again, was appropriate for the movies.

But eight ads? Way too many. WAAAAAY too many. Why is this even acceptable? Why do I need to defend an ad online ad model that offers free content and candy that costs $1.50 and not $4.50?

My point? If you are going to shell out $11 per movie ticket, should you have to sit through 10 minutes of advertising? I was suddenly reminded - very directly - about just how sweet a deal we’ve got right now with online video.

How many ads are in front of my streamed movies from Netflix? One. For Netflix. And its really a placeholder while the content buffers. How many ads during an online hour of Lost? Three. How many on TV? At least 4 ads per break.

I’m not rushing back to the movie theater any time soon, thats for sure. I’m off the movie release schedule and on the DVD release schedule, and not looking back.

CBS Launches HD Player. Content HD. Ad? Not So Much.

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

CBS has launched their new HD Video portal with plenty of CBS content to enjoy. A quick view of a few shows on the laptop confirms that the content looks clear, sharp and doesn’t stutter. Looking forward to checking it out on the big screen as usual.

But, wait. What about the ads? I’m glad you asked. Either CBS doesn’t have an HD version of the ads they are using, or are streaming in the ads from a different platform. The ad I saw was so fuzzy that I could barely read the text in it. A second version of the ad was also undeniably low-def.

So what gives? From my perch, I know for a fact that there is demand for online HD content for advertisers to run their HD ads in. Could be some A-B testing going on, but all the ads I’ve seen so far are fuzzy.

Solid ad strategy as well. The first pre-roll is only :15 seconds. Once you are into the content, the ads become :30s. Smart. Why? You’ve already got them hooked, and there’s still fewer ads than on TV. Solid value prop.

Ben Adds: The player offers two quality settings - 720P HD and 480i which CBS terms HQ (High Quality). It looks like the ads are in 480i resolution which would explain the distortion. Intel has signed on as a sponsor so what you’ll see is an Intel ad delivered by CBSi.

On a user-experience note, I just became a fan of Flashpoint, it was the first thing I watched and I was compelled enough that I watched the full episode and the next one because of the quality of the video and the content. CBS hasn’t offered much info about how the video is delivered but you can’t argue with the way it looks.

OMMA Video Panel: The Format Wars

Monday, June 16th, 2008

Moderator: Steve Smith
Philip Braden, ScanScout
Eric Hadley, CEO, Heavy
Rebecca Paoletti, Yahoo
Chris Allen, Starcom

Panel starts with some show-and-tell.

ScanScout Philip Braden shows overlays. Plays in-stream while the video is playing. From that point on, the ad experience is completely user initiated. New example that Philip showed was a video-in-video overlay. Cool demo alert: There was video playing in the overlay. Lots of potential here.

Eric Hadley, CMO, Heavy.com, shows an example from the Husky Media Network. It is a full page takeover that wraps around the video player. They also have a video guide that can load other syndicated content, and then serve an ad against the syndicated content, which has been pre-vetted for ad friendliness. Essentially, their ad covers up all of the content on a website except the video player. It removes the risk of having your ad seen along side questionable content.

Rebecca starts by asking the room how many people would buy those Heavy skins. Not one hand. Then into the Yahoo pitch. Four different formats, but 90% of their revenue comes from only two of those formats. User is prompted to roll over for more info. When the user does, an overlay appears that can be interacted with. Rebecca says they are seeing 6% CTR on them. A whole 6%. Not a “point-six percent.” She also shows a persistent bug that sits on top of the player that will launch an overlay. Clicking on the subsequent overlay can launch a microsite that sits on top of the player. For each clip, the advertiser gets three opportunities to engage.

Steve: What types of content are these formats good for monetizing? How do they map and match against different types of content?

ScanScout: overlays work across all types of content. They also work great for short form content where you can’t show a pre-roll. You can also contextually target the ads. We have a fair number of publishers that have UGC, and we can filter out undesirable content. The technology is flexible, which allows a brand like Disney to have different standards than Budweiser.

Eric, Heavy: We find that the skins are excellent for monetizing longer form content. We can show multiple ads without asking the user to interrupt their experience. The video guide allows the advertiser to know what content their ads will be next to.

Rebecca: We can serve pre-roll against a lot of our professionally produced content, like sports highlights. Some publishers don’t like overlays because their content is their ‘bread and butter’ and they don’t want it covered.

Philip: We can also put the overlay under the player for publishers who don’t want to cover any of their content.

Steve: Are we effectively monetizing short news clips?
Rebecca: Specific content may not be monetized on purpose. Breaking news, for example. We want users to be able to get a hurricane update immediately, without watching an ad.

Steve: Are these formats making video safer for brands?
Chris: We have two buckets. UGC and not UGC. Most of our advertisers believe they can reach their audience without dipping into the UGC pool. But we still see tons of pre-roll, mainly because its easy. They’ve already created it. We advocate for shorter ads. But you can’t get substantial reach without looking to the portals. We also look at the ad-to-content ratio for a publisher. 4:1 content to ad ratio is probably OK. We’re helping our advertisers understand what they can do with video. Most of them don’t know that you can do lead gen with video.

Steve: What about portability? Is there pushback from publishers or brands that don’t want their ads to follow the content as it is hypersyndicated?
Philip: We integrate our technology so that the ads can travel with the video. But we also want to know where the content has gone before we serve an ad.

Rebecca: Portability was a huge push for our latest ad formats. We wanted to make it easy for our publishers to use. We focused on keeping the interactions within the video player.

Chris: We want see where the content goes before we buy ads. Syndicating content out to social networks is still scary for a lot of advertisers. When we first started talking about syndication of content across the web, we knew it would be huge. Previously we had always applied the value to the content. But we’re finding that there is also a lot of value on the publisher that delivers the content. The CBS Audience Network still gets the majority of their views from CBS.com.

Steve: How well do the formats encourage video use?
Eric: We wanted to be able to monetize the video anywhere, and not force people to watch a pre-roll. When you serve an ad in the middle of a video, you’ve already got the user hooked. You need to get them hooked first. If they back out of the video because of a pre-roll, you lose all the potential ad impressions that would have come after it.

Philip: Its hard to say that any form of advertising encourages viewing. But ads need to be configured in a way so that it doesn’t alienate users.

Rebecca: This is an ongoing debate. I always have people saying “kill the pre-roll.” And we’ll test it, but it never affects the levels of video consumption. Our focus is on the number of videos to ads. On the entertainment side, there is no difference in video consumption regardless of the ad format.

Steve: Video ads are becoming more interactive. It is still interruptive, even if it is up to them. Are people really willing to interact with an ad?

Philip: Engagement in general is good. We are 1%+ CTR on the overlays. But more than half of the people that click on the overlay eventually click through to the destination site.

Erik: We put the interactivity in the skin because it is such a large piece of real estate. Our audience multitasks. They want to watch a bunch of goofy videos, not really paying attention.

Steve: Are we getting to the point where there is confusion in the market about what constitutes a video ad?

Erik: You need to try lots of things.

Chris: People expect new things. They want to be entertained and have fresh new things in front of them while they are surfing the web. Part of our job is to be respectful of the user experience.

Steve: What are you charging media buyers for these ad formats?
Philip: Overlays start at $10 CPM.
Erik: We’re looking at $25 CPMs
Rebecca: We’re in the middle of negotiating our upfronts, but generally CPMs start at $25 for ROS because we are able to do a lot of targeting.

Chris: When I compare video CPMs to TV, there is a huge premium online. And we’re willing to pay that premium if we know that it is being effective. I think the “teens” is a good rate for pre-roll.

Nalts Nails Video Sponsorship On The Head

Thursday, June 12th, 2008

Head on over to Kevin Nalt’s Will Video For Food and read his post on video sponsorships, product placement and selling out. Its spot on.

In it, he cites 5 trends for online video product placement. I particularly liked #4:

4. There will be no trend four. Trend four is often wrong, which itself is a growing trend.

So go read the other trends, and the rest of the post.

First Look: Bikini Zone Viral Video

Thursday, June 12th, 2008

Hysterical video from Bikini Zone.


Uncensored Bootlegged Japanese Bikini Commercial - Watch more free videos

Let us know what you think!

Kate Kaye on Politics and Online Advertising

Friday, June 6th, 2008

As most of you know, ClickZ’s Kate Kaye provides some of the most insightful analysis of the online ad market. Like me, she’s also a political junkie.

Now that the primary season is over, Kate explains to the Business News Network how the campaigns leveraged new media, and who succeeded, and why.

Ed sidenote: Are non-embeddable players even acceptable any more? Why I can’t share this clip with you right here is beyond me.

Larry Kramer on Ad Networks

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

There’s certainly been a lot of discussion about ad networks, how they function, and the value that they bring to advertisers and publishers. In this interview with TechConfidential, Larry Kramer, founder of MarketWatch, weighs in as well.

Adweek’s Ad of the Day

Thursday, May 15th, 2008

This online video campaign, for AMP energy drinks, is my new favorite ad. BBDO Worldwide certainly nailed their audience. I’m predicting “Tea Partay” type numbers.

Head over to Adweek or Brightcove to watch.

Webby Award Winners Announced

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

Congrats the winners - and nominees - of this year’s Webby Awards, which were announced earlier today. Naturally a special nod to those in the online film and video category, as well as those in the interactive advertising category. All categories have a “Webby” Award - the official winner - as well as a “People’s Choice” Award, so go check out some of the best of the web.

In case you didn’t know, The Webby Awards honor excellence on the Internet. The Webbys are presented by The International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences, a 550-member body of leading Web experts, business figures, luminaries, visionaries and creative celebrities. The actual awards take place June 8-10 in New York.

Vote for MoveOn’s “People’s Choice” Obama Vid

Tuesday, April 29th, 2008

If you are from the left or from the right - or somewhere in the middle - don’t let your politics get in the way of voting for your favorite Obama in :30 video.

More than 3 million people voted to nail down 15 finalists. Thanks, 3 million people. I didn’t want to sit through the terrible ones.